電影《葉問2：宗師傳奇》--- 觀後感

《葉問2：宗師傳奇》延續了上一集的原班人馬，再次的呈現精彩的武打動作片。筆者通常希望對於講述歷史人物的電影，其内容會跟著正史走。但這部戯與上一集一樣是不跟正史走的，所以唯能把期望放動作上。

《葉問2》一樣的把詠春拳的貼身靠打的技巧的獨特性質給展露出來。筆者覺得最接近實戰的應該為天台上，葉問一對三的那場景。那個“問手”的段落也蠻有趣的。應該只有有練拳的人才會懂那是什麽意思。

漁場一場就有點牽強了。縂覺得如果與那麽多拿著傢伙的人打應該不會這樣一車輪戰的方式對陣吧。應該是四面八方一起來襲才對。

在茶樓的桌上比試也有另一番風景。在限制著的範圍及時間内得保持個人平衡及不敗的餘地算是一種極大的挑戰。慣於貼身靠打風格的詠春拳本來就不會是一個大問題。只是對這部戯的失望在於第二位拳師，鄭師傅所用的八卦掌。筆者有幸認識一些練八卦掌的前輩們，所以對戯裏的鄭師傅的動作招式也略知一二。很可惜的是戯裏的八卦掌招式雖然正確，但是在運用上卻非常的錯。那些轉身的動作不是那樣子用的。看到了一套如此精致的内家拳，即八卦掌，在這戯裏被糟蹋，心裏不免有點沒落。。。最多只能“怪”戯裏的鄭師傅“學藝不精”，單練了外形而無神韻。

洪震南與葉問那一戰也排的相當好。雖然我對兩家拳法認識不深，但在動作上卻很明確的展示了個別的特質、招招清楚。這與洪金寳及甄子丹在《殺破狼》裏以混合搏擊的對決有很大的對比。

兩人對決到最後到桌子被打倒分半，不分高低。這。。。有點誇張了吧。。。怎們說這部戯講的算是近代的武林史，而非武俠小説，怎麽兩人都飛了起來呢？

雖然這部戯沒跟正史走，但其實故事的前半段還蠻喜歡的。至少還有點真實感。畢竟在二戰後開武錧當然不會是一件容易的事。也喜歡看洪震南與葉問那種從厭惡到猩猩相惜的火花。而後至與英國拳王，龍捲風對陣，而整個武林界能放下己見而團結也拿捏的好。

看到洪震南被龍捲風痛毆時，還真的一股無名火在胸裏冒起。也不只是否看這部戯時，是否受到本地小學母語制度風波影響，縂覺得很惋惜華僑不懂得珍惜華人的傳統及智慧。當葉問以二字鉗羊馬鎖住龍捲風的頭并不斷的以日字沖拳一直往龍捲風的臉轟下去時，我也不禁的在戲院裏喊了個“爽嗎！”（以福建話喔）。

當然時候覺得有點笨，這畢竟也只是一齣戲。可能也受了背景音樂的影響而一時不覺得情緒也被牽著走了。看這部戯終究也是爲了看甄子丹打而已，所以應該無需這麽激動、認真。

但這部戯還是體現了中國武術的内涵。就在一名練武者越有成就時，反倒會越内斂。我很喜歡這訊息。練武的基本也是在於強身、防身，絕非練了功後仗勢欺人。我會銘記葉問在戯裏對黃梁的那句話：-

“貴於中和，不爭之爭”

yamizi's layman review - Shake Hands With The Devil

I got to watch this show for attending the film study. This film is an adaption from a book of the same title.

Thanks to Roderick for giving us a brief background information that happened around this tragedy.

It is a heavy film for me.

Initially I thought that the movie will be pretty much the same like Black Hawk Down, We Were Soldiers, that type of genre.

It turns out to be very different. The movie was shot from this Force Commander's perspective and of course the Force Commander should not be fighting at the frontline!

However, Roméo Dallaire, the Force Commander, faced a different type of pressure and stress. How he felt so helpless by being a Commander who commands over limited firepower and very restricted rule-of-engagement in a hot zone.

There are questions left in my mind after watching the film:-

1. I can probably never understand why the UN disapproved Dallaire's plan to seize the weapons caches. It reminded me of the infamous quote from Edmund Burke, "The only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.".

2. I can also probably never understand that with the escalating tension that was reported by Dallaire, the rules of engagement became more stringent (which is usually meant for areas that have no eminent danger) making the peace keepers facing higher risk and putting them into disadvantage. Which caused the death of the Belgian soldiers.

3. I also do not understand why Dallaire was asked to withdraw his troops when they had already set up sites to protect innocent displaced personnel.

On a lighter note,

4. I wonder did the scene where Dallaire and his personal staff assistant were aimed with machine gun for walking past the road check set by the solider really happened.

5. Did the scene where Dallaire shaking hand with someone pointing him with a gun at point blank really took place? I thought that the way Dallaire handled the situation was wise. He neither admit nor deny his identity. He just approached to shake hand with the man who was told to kill him with his signature smile.

6. Did the scene where Dallaire shooting the dogs that were chasing the chickens really happen? That suggested that he was breaking, the stress and pressure was just so overwhelming.

After the show, it left me pondering what are the roles of the UN. Does performing peacekeeping duties means to compromise the troops' safety? It's kind of weird isn't it?

I was very sad to know the death of the Belgium soldiers. Especially it was due to following the protocol. I believe they had never expect their ending would be so tragic. They were special forces but murdered without able to put up a fight. What was not shown in the movie was that they died in a very indignify manner. The perpetrators were jailed eventually. Maybe it's just me but I feel that it's a pretty good deal for these perpetrators who have destroyed and wrecked the lives of so many people but they were only jailed. I felt something really wrong here. It led me thinking that why people become soldiers. Maybe they really love their country but damn, they died in a foreign land in the most indignified and disrespectful manner.

Even thinking of this movie now brings on a certain dark emotion in my heart. Sighs...

yamizi's layman review - movie - How To Train Your Dragon

I got to watch this in 2D instead of 3D, not that I think of that would make any difference.

Anyway, a tested and proven storyline, about how friendship is fostered through times of hardship and overcoming the obstacle as one. I really like that because I think as I grow older, I am seeing less of that. Probably why I am attracted to animation somehow. I like to see nice endings. Life is too fucked.

Besides that, I am really impressed with the innovation in creating different type of dragons and even giving them names! The various colour combination, characteristics and weaknesses make the dragons so much less mythical than we think.

There are 3 things that I really appreciate from the movie:-

1. When Hiccup first met the Night Fury and attempted to kill him. The look between each other's eyes with fear and the Night Fury shut his eyes and dropped his head. The resignation to fate by Night Fury is so heart-wrenching! Although I had no idea how Hiccup was going to kill Night Fury with that small blade of his.

2. When Stoick, who is Hiccup's father, apologised to Hiccup right before he set off with Night Fury (Toothless!) to fight the giant dragon (I don't even bother to capitalised! =P). It takes a lot for a father, especially Stoick, a chieftan to have swallowed his pride and admit he had greatly misunderstood his son.

3. The final aerial combat between Night Fury and giant dragon. I find that the choreography was just facinating. Who have really seen dragons fight before? Although it will never make sense that thin pair of wings could have pulled the giant dragon in the air, but it's animation afterall! Anything could happened! Back to the battle, I was keep thinking how Night Fury was going to win the giant dragon as the giant dragon was just way too much bigger in size and damaging power! I like the way how the battle went, in the same time, keeping the audience intensed and also thinking how it would turned out.

What really broke my heart was that Hiccup lost part of his left leg. It was never explained why that happened. You see, I really love nice endings. Yet it will seem way too impossible for Hiccup not to have lost anything after fighing such a gigantic monster. Even Night Fury lost part of his tail after getting shot down by Hiccup. Losing part of his leg making the story a bit more realistic.

As much as digital effects are getting better and more sophisticated nowadays, a good story and a good storytelling technique are still vital in ensuring a good movie. The motions and effects are just the form, the story is the soul and the storytelling technique is how the soul moves the form. I look forward to many more nice, simple, touching and with happy ending animations coming along.

yamizi's layman review - movie - Clash of the Titans

This is the remake of the 1981's version. I have not watched that but from a friend who had watched it shared with me that this remake omit quite a bit of storyline from the original.

I'm not quite sure why is there such a fancination over having the movie to be watched in 3D format. I'm quite okay with it less that the Chinese subtitles really stood out. Up (I just realise I didn't write a review for it!?) did not have this problem. Some of my friends commented that they feel giddy and sore in the eyes after watching 3D. Ain't no idea why.

On the whole, appreciate the tempo of the drama as a whole. There are 2 things I don't appreciate:-

1. The number of soldiers who followed Perseus flunctuates greatly. Some scenes a lot of people while some other scenes very little. Never really put a note how many of them were killed in each battle too.

2. Perseus claimed that he mend nets and not weilding sword but somehow, he becomes a master in swords and sure know how to slash some demons! He even knew that by raising up his sword and having it thrown at Hades, the lightning would have struck the sword to make it even more powerful and damaging! No idea how he got that idea but it just worked!

There are 2 other things that I do appreciate:-

1. The visual effect that took place whenever Hades appear or disappear from a scene.

2. The lagging effect that took place when the Kraken looked at Medusa's eyes.

It's quite a good action and adventure entertaining piece of movie, ain't sure is there any morale of the story to take note though.

電影《大兵小將》--- 觀後感

影像中這是成龍第一部全套古裝的戯。上一部的《神話》是穿插著古裝與時裝。有趣的是，這兩部戯都圍繞在戰國時代。在《神話》裏為秦國大將，在《大兵小將》裏為戰鬥經驗豐富的梁囯老兵。

本人非常喜歡及欣賞成龍在這部戯裏的嘗試。雖然是主角，但卻不一定武藝、戰功超卓，反而就是個小人物！對我而言，成龍算是個很會講故事的人。看著這部戯，感覺就象他把你也裹進了他回返老家的旅程。成龍一貫的把詼諧惹笑的元素很自然地融入戯裏。除了一些家喻戶曉的成龍式臉部表情外，他給我的整個感覺都不像在演戲。感覺上成龍好像真的在冒險似的，挺自然的。

王立宏也是形象大減。雖然身為一個國家的太子，但就是落魄到底。一世的英明也都被一個裝死的逃兵給毀了。這是我第一次看立宏在大銀幕，我覺得他也演得很稱職。
兵雖然智勇都不如將，但他卻能以他自個兒的本事擒住將。兵的夢想是簡單的很。他就是想要回老家耕田。但到戯的尾端才知道他老家早沒了。父親死了，兩位兄長也都殉職了。這樣的悲痛，身於戰亂的時候，說了也沒人理你的。

就這樣哼著家鄉的歌謠，嘴裏撈說著：“挺好的！”，這樣的苟且餘生。這樣像是條漢子嗎？就只是要僅循父親臨終前所囑咐的留個香火嘛。活捉了個敵將，就整天想著怎麽去用那五畝田。實在可愛。

將帶表了大人物，那種兵所厭惡的，爲了一己私欲，到處打戰，民不聊生，還把兵老家的田給燒了，也害到他們兄弟三人被徵用服軍役去了。不就是想過些安穩的生活嘛。但就因爲這些大人物往往把事情給複雜化，那事情也越變越無法收拾。

故事的結尾處理也很棒。兵的那種失望，感覺像是如夢初醒。什麽五畝田，什麽活捉敵將，完全都落空。也就在那才示出不屈服的將士精神。都沒地方去了。。。都快死了。。。還覺得對不起他的爹。。。

整體的感覺，雖然詼諧但卻隱隱有濃濃的反戰爭意識。對我而言，比《蘇乞兒》好看得多了。

電影《蘇乞兒》--- 觀後感

看這部戯還真的只是爲了看周迅。她的古裝造型好美喔。除了美還是美。她在戯裏的表現也很好，雖然戯過了一半她便死了。也很欣賞那個演她兒子的小演員。都很會演！

除此之外，如同一名有人與我分享的，無須質疑袁八爺的武術動作場面，他畢竟屬於國際級的，但他不是個很會說故事的人。袁烈的那一段戯就很多不合邏輯的橋斷。好像當了提督便沒事幹。還能跑去學了什麽五毒神功，回來仇殺養父，無法無天。到後面被蘇燦打死，也沒事？！怎麽廣東十虎變得這麽目無法紀的？也好像那裏的地方沒政府！連後面那段蘇燦如何使出醉拳看起來象是硬硬插進去，沒有連貫性。雖説到動作場面好，但後面的醉拳裏摻雜了霹靂舞的一些地板動作，委實噁心。

是曾經聼過一些前輩提到練武到了某高增次的境界，是會有所謂的假想敵出現在意境之中。但這也是需要某冥想禪修的功課方能達到。假想敵也非妄想中的幻想。就是覺得這所謂意境的部分處理得不好。連後面的那個醉仙的出現，也是亂七八糟。不是每個藝人能朝多方面發展的。周傑倫。。。我覺得他專心寫歌、唱歌好了。

電影《錦衣衛》--- 觀後感

在片子的開頭有段是在講述錦衣衛的背景與由來。聼來還真讓我有點半信半疑。也不知是否錦衣衛的出生都是如此淒涼；也不知是否真的有如此錦盒能發放飛刀之類的暗器。有所失望的是，戯裏頭的鏢師出乎意料的弱。据我的了解，若按歷史而言，鏢師的武藝一般上都蠻強的。

但整體來説，非常欣賞甄子丹在《錦衣衛》裏的演出。該片的故事也出乎我意料之外。原先還以爲可能只是一般的武俠動作片。但卻不然。這部戯由個人爲了奪回尊嚴而戰漸至于國家安危的闘智闘勇之爭。有趣的是，甄子丹所飾演的青龍，雖説乃錦衣衛内的高手，但也不止是一介武夫。在他被陷害且被朝廷通緝時，負傷的青龍懂得不以蠻力對抗。畢竟，寡難敵眾。這樣子更能凸顯錦衣衛的指揮使是文武雙全的。

與喬花的邂逅十分另類，但卻彼此似乎走進了彼此的心。但如大漠判官所言，青龍想奪回的並不止是個人尊嚴那麽的簡單，而是承載了老百姓安危的行動。

我覺得有趣的是，如同《十月圍城》一樣，甄子丹，雖然在戯裏武藝卓絕，但也是與敵人拼個同歸于盡。我覺得這樣子的安排不錯。通常都認爲主角不會死的，尤其在武俠片子裏，但《錦衣衛》的結尾就不一樣了。青龍雖死，但他的計劃一樣的完成。也有可能故事人覺得，反正青龍也不過是個官職的尊稱，那甄子丹的青龍，也並不是無可取代的。畢竟朝廷財多勢大，給與假以時日，另一個“青龍”又可以被訓練出來。

戯裏整體的武打動作非常的利落也編排的很緊湊。唯一讓我摸不着頭的是甄子丹在樹林裏幹掉了追殺他的錦衣衛群後被一灰鬚、拿著斬馬刀的人埋伏。呣。。。那個人是誰啊？除了自爆為賈公公所派來要他的命之外，連個名都沒有！。。。就叫他刺客甲吧！